Commonsense Entailment: A Modal Theory of Non-monotonic Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Nicholas Asher
  • Michael Morreau
چکیده

In this paper, we construct a truth conditional semantics for generic sentences, which treats arbitrarily deep nestings of generic sentences. The resulting notion of logical entailment captures intuitively valid argument forms involving generics. A dynamic semantics is built on top of the truth conditional one, and the resulting inference notion captures nonmonotonic argument patterns familiar from the artificial intelligence literature by exploiting constraints on modal frames alone, without the use of ordering principles on rules, abnormality or "relevance" predicates.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Comparison of the Commonsense and Fixed Point Theories of Nonmonotonicity

The mathematical fixed point theories of nonmonotonic reasoning are examined and compared to a commonsense theory of nonmonotonic reasoning which models our intuitive ability to reason about defaults. It is shown that all of the known problems of the fixed point theories are solved by the commonsense theory. The concepts of this commonsense theory do not involve mathematical fixed points, but i...

متن کامل

A modal perspective on defeasible reasoning

We introduce various new supraclassical entailment relations for defeasible reasoning and investigate some of their relationships. The contrapositive of the usual nonmonotonic preferential entailment turns out to be a monotonic supraclassical entailment. Analogously to these two, a nonmonotonic and its contrapositive monotonic supraclassical entailment can be defined by using modal operators re...

متن کامل

Approximate coherence-based reasoning

It has long been recognized that the concept of inconsistency is a central part of commonsense reasoning. In this issue, a number of authors have explored the idea of reasoning with maximal consistent subsets of an inconsistent stratified knowledge base. This paradigm, often called “coherent-based reasoning", has resulted in some interesting proposals for paraconsistent reasoning, non-monotonic...

متن کامل

Inconsistency Management and Prioritized Syntax-Based Entailment

The idea of ordering plays a basic role in commonsense reasoning for addressing three interrelated tasks: inconsistency handling, belief revision and plausible inference. We study the behavior of non-monotonic inferences induced by various methods for priority-based handling of inconsistent sets of classical formulas. One of them is based on a lexicographic ordering of maximal consistent subset...

متن کامل

Is There a Logic of Provability for Nonmonotonic Reasoning?

Nonmonotonic logic is a well developed research area gathering the logical formalisms that handle commonsense reasoning. One of the central issue in the area is to establish a notion of nonmonotonic provability, which is usually characterized via some modal logic. In MST93] a clear paradigm has been proposed that classiies modal monotonic logics , augmented with the \negation by fail-ure" to pr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1990